Day together. I`m new here. I think a research paper is academic writing based on its author`s original research on a particular topic. It can be a sessional work, a master`s thesis or a doctoral thesis. And a review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic. A research paper is an extended form of essay. Students are often tasked with research paper projects at the end of each semester. The purpose of assigning the document is to evaluate their results throughout the course and see how they interpret the data given. « Once you`ve written the basic exam section, take a step back and look for common trends that are emerging.
Highlight significant progress that has been made and areas where more focused research can have a significant impact. These are crucial to show where the terrain is going and the common pitfalls that people face. A research paper is based on original research. The type of research may vary depending on the topic or topic (experiments, survey, interview, questionnaire, etc.), but authors must collect and analyze raw data and conduct an original study. The research is based on the analysis and interpretation of this data. Both are peer-reviewed prior to publication. To simplify the submission and publication process, you can opt for an automated journal management platform. If you are new to writing research papers, I recommend taking this course, designed exclusively for young scientists: An in-depth academic publication course for young researchers. Before considering how to create a journal article, it makes more sense to examine the motivation behind writing the journal article in question. The fundamental reason for writing a review article is to create a readable synthesis of the best literary sources on a research request or an important topic. This simple definition of a review article contains the following key elements: The research paper, sometimes referred to as empirical or primary sources, reports original research. They usually contain sections such as an introduction, methods, results, and discussions.
Review articles, sometimes called literature reviews or secondary sources, synthesize or analyze research that has already been conducted in primary sources. Typically, they summarize the current state of research on a particular topic. One review focuses on interpreting the primary literature on this topic. You need to read several original research articles on the same topic and draw your own conclusions about the importance of these articles. In terms of growth in journal articles, the rate has been exponential. [28] The number of articles on pathology increased 2.3-fold between 1991 and 2006. In the scientific discipline, the number of review articles in the Science Citation Index increased from 14,815 to 45,829 between 1991 and 2005. Following the same trend, the number of journals in the Science Citation Index database increased from 163 to 198 between 1999 and 2006. Although the percentage of review articles in review journals, which formed the basis of the review literature, decreased by 17% between 1999 and 2005. [8] This suggests that most review articles are associated with original research journals, as opposed to purely critical reviews. It also depends on the quality of the journal articles published. A systematic review is more detailed and structured than a narrative review.
It clearly describes the objectives, hypothesis and research method in order to remain transparent and neutral. [6] This review format follows explicit criteria when selecting research included in the review. Common methods of analyzing selected research articles include text mining, citation, cocitation analysis, and topic modeling. This type of review also involves a discussion of the theoretical implications of such research. Systematic reviews are highly valued and selected over narrative reviews because of their specificity and neutrality. [5] In the area of clinical research, The Cochrane Organization publishes Cochrane Reviews on health issues in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. [7] The use of appropriate methodologies in review articles is important in that readers adopt an objective attitude towards updated information. We may face two problems when using research data to answer certain questions.
First, we may be biased in the selection of research papers, or those articles may be biased. To minimize this risk, the methods used in our reviews should allow us to define and use research with minimal levels of bias.