The law touches our daily lives and plays a fundamental role in our social, political and economic existence. Managing laws what is good and bad; good and evil; desirable and undesirable; What we can and cannot do, and it is used to settle, punish and govern disputes! Jurisprudence is the science or philosophy of law. There are various schools of law that try to determine what the source of the law is and how it should be interpreted. For example, the natural law school says that God is the source of the law. The positivist school asserts that the sovereign (also called sovereign or governing body) is the source of the law. The sociological school says that the source of law is contemporary opinion and community customs. The American Realist School says that the actors of the legal system are the source of law. We have seen that one of the natures of the law is that it is a standard. The general statement of a rule of law is not a mere reproduction.
In fact, all social norms differ from the simple readmission of a philosopher or doctor, etc. Certainly, such theses of philosophers and physicians can be useful addresses; But no one is obliged to follow them. On the contrary, legal norms are binding. In fact, the essence of legal norms is that members of society are required to behave in accordance with the law. Therefore, we usually refer to statements about what will happen to a recipient who behaves in accordance with the law attached to general statements. These are what we call sanctions. Sanctions answer the question: how does the community or group behave if standards are not met? What safeguards are in place to ensure that the standard is met? Sanctions are of different types, but their common goal is to form standards and follow prescribed standards. Even permissive norms are protected by sanctions; Although, in their case, the sanction is directed against the person authorized to do the thing, but against the rest of the world, who orders all others not to interfere with the rights of the person so authorized.
« Away from their heads! » recalls the Queen of Hearts` cry for the slightest injustice or injury in Alice`s adventures in Wonderland and gives an idea of what it would be like to live in a society that is not governed by the « rule of law ». Corporate social responsibility is a concern of companies with respect to their activities, both for-profit and not-for-profit, and their intentional and unintended impact on groups and individuals other than business owners. For example, companies can consider the impact they have on consumers, end-users, environmentalists, governments, other businesses and political groups. Social responsibility goes beyond knowing what is legal or illegal. To be socially responsible, companies often want to do more than what is required by law. (3) The law shall constitute and recognize the principal organs of power in the State. It provides for the transfer of power and defines who has the right to exercise what kind of power in society. The power thus recognized by law turns to make laws in society. Thus, while the law creates the state, the state creates the law. The law, in developing its standards, must not seek to impose the good life as such; He must always weigh the benefits to be obtained through obedience with the harm that the crude instrument of coercion can cause.
There are many ethical rules, the respect of which lies in the voluntary choice of those who try to follow them. Nevertheless, there are other rules that the law must apply for the benefit of the community. Ethics therefore perfects the law. In marriage, as long as love lasts, there is little need for laws to govern husband-wife relations, but the lawyer enters through the door while love flies out the window. The law therefore only sets standards that are considered essential, regardless of the reason for compliance. In a sense, the law may be a « minimal ethic, » but often the law has to resolve disputes that ethical rules shed very little light on – if two people who are not guilty of negligence have suffered as a result of third-party fraud, who should bear the damage? Ethics may suggest that loss should be divided equally, but this is not a very practical rule for law that requires certain rules for the transfer of title and the performance of contracts.